Demystifying Usability

Privacy: your biggest user experience challenge

"We are all in the privacy business".

This was my general conclusion when working on next generation usability for the popular directory look-up portal  whitepages.com website (used by 200 million adults in the US). It doesn't matter what your website does online, if it involves giving consumers information, you are in the privacy business first and foremost. What does this mean?

Privacy is one of the biggest concerns users bring to the Web experience. It doesn't help that companies like Google have been rated worst privacy of all global companies for "comprehensive consumer surveillance and entrenched hostility to privacy" (Privacy International 2007). Worse popular sites like Facebook continue to struggle with privacy, as evidenced by the leak of sensitive information by the Face-booking spouse of the next head of the British Secret Service (MI6) this week.

As long as privacy continues to be a concern, you will have to address it in a way that makes sense to your consumer. "See our privacy policy" does not count. Users are not legal sleuths and since privacy is a concern the majority of users have, we are talking about perception of privacy as much as actual privacy itself. 

In this post I will cover the importance of privacy in online user experience and give you three proven usability guidelines for privacy user experience on your site.

Privacy cited as the #1 blocker to ecommerce conversions

Privacy continues to be the most dominant concern of users online dominating empirical and industry studies in the past decade (Cavoukian and Crompton, 2000; Burst Media 2009). In this 2003 empirical study (Ahuja; Gupta; Raman) of online consumer purchasing behavior, privacy and security concerns ranked #1 as the reason for preventing user from purchasing online.

The big search engines are not helping the privacy problem. Only Yahoo this year demonstrated leadership in the privacy area stating they will only retain personally identifiable information for 90 days. To appease privacy groups, Google reduced its cookie that expires in 2038 to a two year expiration period. 

Privacy and Security: What's the difference??

When I mention privacy as a user experience issue, a lot of technical folks look at me and say, "privacy and security are not the same thing!". Yes, that is true, but to a user-- privacy and security are intertwined and technical distinctions are non-existent.

Worse when sites carrying the Hacker Safe logo were shown to be hack-able, user fears not only become warranted but justified.  Note: Marketing Sherpa case studies and our own clients told us they lifted conversions on ecommerce sites using the old Hacker Safe logo, so it did work to ease perception of privacy/security. Sorry I don't have any data on how it's performing with the new MacAfee acquisition of Hacker Safe.

Privacy settings mandatory for Social Networking site

Facebook has struggled with privacy usability and garnered a lot of negative attention this year from it. Since European privacy laws are much more protective of users, regulators are now looking for better privacy protection from Facebook and Twitter announced in late June 2009.

Facebook continues to violate the first privacy pitfall identified by Lederer et.al (2004)

"To whatever degree is reasonable, systems should make clear the nature and
extent of their potential for disclosure. Users will have difficulty appropriating a system
into their privacy practice if the scope of its privacy implications is unclear".

It was only with the recent 3/09 redesign that the Settings link was made more apparent on Facebook's top navigation. Still, how many users even know privacy controls are there? I didn't and I was looking for it. In February I had to have a colleague guide me through to the area where privacy is managed inside the Settings section. Once inside the Settings area, the task of managing your privacy settings falls into what I call Configuration Hell (see previous post). Incidentally this is also the third privacy pitfall in the Lederer et.al.research: Emphasizing configuration over action.

Over the next few weeks (July 2009), Facebook will unveil a new set of privacy features that will according to Computerworld alleviate "the need to tamper with the site's privacy controls as frequently" without needing a handbook to get all your Facebook privacy settings under control. I'll circle back and do a follow up Privacy Scorecard for Facebook in a future post.

LinkedIn the other popular business social networking site offers better privacy usability. LinkedIn allows you to View your Profile as Others See it. They also state whether an item of content is visible or hidden. These two strategies have kept LinkedIn out of the privacy public relations spotlight, while offering a transparent privacy user experience. This 'contextual privacy' is simply the best and easiest way for users to be aware, in control and able to manage privacy inside of their user experience.

3 Privacy Usability Guidelines for your site:

1. Provide a feel-good abbreviation of your long-winded privacy legal statement. Put your lawyers creativity to work, or better yet have them approve content you create. Users do not go looking for privacy statements, nor do they translate legal parlance in quick glances if they do happen to scroll that huge page you keep your privacy policy on. Guarantees in layperson's terms such as "Peace of Mind: we'll do everything we can to protect your personal information". Here's a great example from top online retailer Lands End (they had a better example for 8 years, here's the latest one from their recent redesign):

2. Justify and reassure every form capture with privacy reassurance. Anytime you ask for an email address, you need to reassure users that you care about their privacy. It does not matter how loyal or interested they are, if you are committed to privacy- show it. Here's an example from the Experience Dynamics research newsletter:

3. Show users what is being shared and provide contextual privacy controls. Goecks et.al (2009) developed prototypes to demonstrate that it is not necessary for users to understand low level technical details to make informed decisions about their privacy. Giving users clues such as (Everyone can see this) or (Showing to All/ Hide...) or' See this How Others see it', without requiring users to log in under a different account to see that 200 million users can also see your high-profile spouse in his Speedo alongside his personal address.

Here's an example from Whitepages.com

For WhitePages.com privacy features such as editable personal details of your directory listing (called 'Is this you? Edit') give users control of data that might be publicly available without their knowledge. Creating an account also lets users own their level of privacy control, with various levels of hide/show.

Privacy- the Story Continues...

This week, it was announced that the US government (FTC) is seeking stricter privacy controls, triggering an early response draft of Privacy Principles from the largest marketing trade industries. The guidelines are aimed at educating users as to how their data is being tracked online, with a "privacy dashboard". If you have ever worked with users, educating them (providing training or help-see my prior post) about privacy online seems to be a lame-duck approach. The New York Times pointed out (July 6th 2009) four things that the privacy principles left out, putting the onus on the technology and the design (user experience) not on the user's understanding or managing their own privacy.

Best Wishes,

Frank Spillers, MS

President Obama: Vision for Usability?

Usability awareness back in the White House?

Obama is already being described as the Internet President. Will his Internet savvy include an agenda for usability? If so, what might that agenda include? In this post I explore these questions, connect some dots and present some potential solutions for how Obama's technology goals are linked deeply to harnessing usability best practices.

Tech innovators get excited

Late in the election season, Silicon Valley expressed its joy that a pro-technology President is back, as witnessed by Google's CEO promoting Obama in the weeks before the election, as well as former CEO's of eBay and HP and Microsoft also backing Obama in the run up to the election.

Al Gore was the closest the US has been to a pro-IT cabinet level politician. In 1998, Al Gore had this to say about usability:

"The benefits of usable technology include reduced training costs, limited user risk and enhanced performance ... American industry and government will become even more productive if they take advantage of usability engineering techniques". Vice President Al Gore 1998

While Al Gore promoted usability as Vice President, it is unclear what actions were taken if any. Ironically, it was usability of the voting experience, underscored by voter fraud and the infamous butterfly ballot, that helped get Gore un-elected in 2000. (The Usability Professionals Association made this one of their civic projects).

Not since Al Gore was Vice President did usability receive any attention at the national level. Where are Obama's views on IT and usability engineering? How strong of an agenda will usability play in Obama's IT plans?

Obama: more likely to understand the importance of usability

Obama's weighs heavily on the value of Information Technology (IT) investment and innovation, including staffing the nation's first office of the Chief Technology Officer (CTO). Obama's vision for IT is to invest in it to further social change. This is distinctly different to Bush's IT agenda which seemed to extend only as far as military and Homeland Security.

Obama has demonstrated that he gets technology. His campaign is a major case study in using IT to redefine grassroots canvassing and organizing. His advances in social networking for political gains were underscored by gigantic followings and views on Facebook, MySpace, YouTube, Twitter, FriendFeed, Flickr and others. Obama's age and tech-savvy combined with his recognizing how to use this stage of the Internet's maturity give him an unprecedented quality as tech champion:

"Some have dubbed him the first Blackberry President, as he can often be seen checking his mobile email device as soon as he gets off a plane.He is an iPod-tuned, Facebook-friendly, Twittering politician who fits right into the digital age and makes other leaders look analogue. Hecan communicate directly with the public via profiles on Facebook and MySpace, photographs on Flickr, videos on YouTube, text message feeds on Twitter and meetings on his own social network myBarackObama.com. 'I must say how excited we all have been to elect a President who at least carries a mobile device,' said Chris Sacca, an internet start-up investor". The Guardian

Obama's tech-savviness was further underscored by change.gov, a forum for voicing citizen concerns and ideas (like Dell's Idea Storm), set up to help bridge the Nov 4th- Jan 20th gap. The Obama team even migrated their opt-in mailing list when closing down the site on Jan 20th with a permission opt-in and redirect welcome message and blog post from the Director of New Media at the White House. The Obama agenda says Phillips, the new Director, is participation, communication and transparency. The transparency initiative was re-enforced by a memo Obama sent a few days later requiring government agencies to "harness new technologies to put information about their operations and decisions online and readily available to the public".

Where will Obama take technology?

President Obama has articulated a strong desire to preserve and support several important issues: Net Neutrality and broadband access to undeserved communities. His IT plan is to bolster social change by harnessing technology and enabling access to the new opportunities afforded by technology. To do this, Obama and his CTO will need to understand and utilize usability engineering best practices.  

"Addressing usability of technology and its relevance to some adults are different kinds of challenges. The technology industry is the main actor here. On the one hand, the industry has ample incentives to improve usability and enhance the relevance of digital content to people's everyday lives. Yet the fact remains that the nature of modern gadgetry is daunting to many people, especially older ones.⁶Many respondents to our surveys tell us they would appreciate a hand in mastering technology and the Obama tech team might decide that government can play a catalytic role in nudging industry to improve usability and relevance through procurement". Pew Research

The Pew study underscores the need for human mastery of technology. Usability is instrumental for social change efforts with technology. Just because you have access does not mean you can use the technology effectively, efficiently, productively, joyfully etc. Usability is an enabler to the goal of empowering humans to use technology.

There are lots of things Obama could do with technology to enhance learning, education and community. For example giving primary schoolchildren laptops (like a project piloted in Northern England in the 1990's) or a neighborhood strengthening online community (piloted in the 1990's in London when I lived in the UK). Alexandra Samuel provides an intriguing list of 50 ways Obama can use the Internet to govern, many of which have already been acted upon by Obama.

But, what should Obama do to ensure that the people getting the technology can use it?

5 Things the Obama Administration should do to improve technology ease of use

1. Understand that a strong usability focus will be needed to achieve social goals.

Today we see usability slowly creeping into regulations and standards. For example, the FDA is mandating usability in medical device development; the government is backing standardization of enterprise software architecture (the FEA framework PDF); or that there are a few existing low-profile initiatives for promoting usability best practices as well as encouraging the importance of usability in government website development. A more coordinated and higher profile effort for "humanizing technology" will be needed. Industry understands that usability creates profitability. Having federal backing can help bootstrap organizations, non-profits and businesses who don't have access to usability methods and expertise.

2. Ensure the new CTO learns from and understands the past 10 years of Web and Software usability best practices.

It is vital that the new federal CTO understands and helps promote usability within the new government. It would be tragic to make the classic mistake of 'technology for technology's sake'. The Obama Web team has demonstrated their skill. For the rest of the government and the older Clinton years politicians, there is a need to educate and champion usable IT. Obama's CTO must be familiar with corporate usability lessons and mistakes in deploying buggy, useless, unsatisfying, unintuitive and user-hostile software and web services over the past decade. Usability is a documented science, this needs to be understood.

3. Realize that the Web 2.0 and Social Media efforts of the campaign and change.gov effort so far tie to a national usability agenda.

People have been able to access Obama's message because he has made it so accessible. If this is accidental then good for you! However there is a science behind this and many more non-savvy companies, organizations and non-profits are light years behind the success that has been pioneered with the Obama campaign.

Any initiative or effort to empower the citizenry with technology needs to be tempered with human-centered design (another name for user-centered design) standards and guidelines.

4.Redefine usability as not just another technical standard or guidelines but an approach to empowering humans with technology.

What Apple has been doing with their products is needed at the national level. Take a vision, base it in known usability best practices and make it work passionately. We need stronger regulations, better initiatives and closer ties with government and industry to promote cross-pollination of best practices.

Usability needs to be understood as not just another technical item (as Accessibility has been treated), but the entire purpose of the product. We need new thinking and leadership within our own usability community to communicate this, and likewise we need an executive federal level understanding that usability is a mandatory requirement and approach for technology initiatives.

5. Technology should be rewarded (funded) when innovated for social good.

What types of innovations can be developed by industry and individuals that support the nations goals for social good? Let's do what Bush did with the Homeland Security innovation dollars but make the innovations we fund have a social improvement backbone, instead of a military and security one.

The Obama government should open up technology innovation (Web and product) to social entrepreneurism. For example, for emergency relief, mash-ups created during Hurricane Katrina helped dislocated persons find shelter...or for health, for example, the Wii Fit is a technology with tangible health benefits (or so I'm told) ;-).

To start, having a conversation about how to get technology to work for the people it's destined for is the first step. It's great we can have this conversation! I would love to hear your thoughts, comments.

Best Wishes,

Frank Spillers, MS

p.s. Issues with Typepad have caused a re-write of some of these paragraphs. So I will call out an interesting news item about Obama's staff digging the White House Out of the Dark Ages for starters (hat tip to Matt Schoolfield).

Designing for the "Average User"

User advocacy is one of the central goals of usability. User advocacy can be defined as the process an IT professional (with an interest in user experience) goes through in re-sensitizing herself to the world of the "average user".

Usability expert reviews are largely an exercise in user advocacy, in addition to an analysis of known usability issues and problems based on knowledge of User Interface Style Guide abnormalities.

So. why do we forget about the "average user" so fast?

We all were average users at one point. We still are when it comes to working with a new program, product or website. The difference between us (IT professionals) and the average user is that we have learned sophisticated coping strategies for figuring out software and the web.

Average users don't care how a program works anymore than you care about how a radio transmits signal while you listen to it or how plants metabolize sunshine to remain green when you look at them.

Average users don't stop to think about how the programmer may have designed a system, how the database is working (as they wait for the round-trip of data back to user interface) or what an icon or screen behavior means. The average user doesn't know, doesn't want to know and has expectations that technology will work "as advertised" and "as expected".

Defining the "average user"

Average User:

• 1.1  A relative: someone in your family (mother, father, grandmother, grandfather, spouse, partner etc.) or what is often called "general population".
• 1.2  A person in a developing country: someone with no IT background and/ or no PC exposure in school.
• 1.3  A literacy-challenged person: someone who is new to or intimidated by a keyboard, mouse or to reading and writing in general.
• 1.4 A non-IT exposed person: a person who has not spent a lot of time with technology due to circumstance (an elderly person; a young child; a disabled person)
• 1.5 You? (Do you know all the ins and outs of every program you use?). Please note if you are reading this, "you are not the average user".

The "average user test" (can be performed on any family member that often asks you for help with technology).

1. Ask the person to open an attachment, edit it and then send it back to you. (Average users don't understand that this requires selecting a non-system file area of your hard-drive first; saving it and then replying with the document as an attachment).

2. Ask the person to take a picture (with a digital camera). Depending on the usability of the hardware manufacturer, the user might fail to get past transferring the images to the computer. If they figure this out, where they store images on the computer may be the show-stopper (Average users don't understand that a custom location needs to be defined and a novel name needs to be given to this "set of photos").

3. Ask the person to reduce the size or lighten the image and send it to you. Image editing is not layperson-friendly. The Mac OS 10 makes this a little easier than Windows XP but the average user is not using a Mac generally, so we're talking Windows XP. Also the average user is not installing all sorts of photo editing programs to find the "best one". By chance they have installed what was provided with the camera, the printer, or something a friend or relative gave them- or all three. The average user did not install the software on their system with volition.

Rules for playing nicely with your "Average User"
or the Alternative User's Bill of Rights (as originally proposed by  IBM's Dr. Clare-Marie Karat)

1. Interaction with system level functions ain't going to happen. This means set-up, installation and all other "Out of Box Experience" (OOBE) aspects need to be considered carefully for average users. Decisions about what and how much of the "back end" administrator functions need to be made with caution. Where possible shelter the average user from "Preferences, Settings, Options" or at least centralize access to and from this area.

2. Customization and personalization behaviors are limited. Instead study default behaviors and spend time getting default functions right (this can not be over-emphasized).

3. Configuration is your average user's worst nightmare. See my article "Configuration Hell- The Case for the Plug and Play User Experience"

4. Anything not apparent, transparent, obvious, intuitive and explained may be problematic. Anything requiring understanding is not intuitive. Intuitive means it does not require understanding.

To simulate the cognition of the "average user" consume one alcoholic beverage and then try to focus on work (if you don't drink, sit at your desk for four hours straight and then try focusing on a new task). That state of distraction, de-focusing and inhibited response is close to how the average user processes your design. Conduct a usability test using the "think aloud protocol" and you'll quickly realize how true (and I hope, funny) this is!

5. Get sober about your technology- on purpose. It's easy to get pulled into the cool value of a technology, harder as a designer to step back and see the bigger business picture or user needs (gained from real  observed user behavior). Usability and user advocacy techniques are not designed to under-value technology, but rather to make technology or specifically user interfaces -subordinate to user interests. User-centered designs historically have out-performed system-centered design.

6. Ignoring the average user can lead to self-fulfilling prophesies. I often hear product managers say "our users are power users" or "if they don't get this, they are not our users". These assumptions are largely self-preserving and seem to counter the usability attitude of "user advocacy". Promote a culture within your team of "Outside-In" design. Stop defending the merits of features and functionality without some independent outside verification from your users.

Remember user advocacy is as much realizing how technology or system-centric your own professional attitudes or behaviours are as much as those of your users.

Best wishes,

Frank Spillers, MS

Configuration Hell- The Case for the Plug and Play User Experience

You know the drill: You download or install a new piece of software or open a new piece of technology (e.g. PDA, mobile phone, laptop) and you have to "configure it" to get something to work or work the way you want it to...

Summary: Users are not usually successful at configuring software, websites or devices and the configuration experience can be a major source of frustration. Instead we need to move toward a world where everything is auto-configured and user experiences are "plug and play".

Defining Configuration: I refer to configuration in it's broadest sense: A user must perform some advanced action in order to get some desired result from software, a web site or a product experience. Typically the term configuration means to adjust or change settings- hiding, activating or altering useful features and system behaviors.

Basic Examples: You want to change your desktop picture?- You need to find that right click menu and select your new choice. You want to use flash on your digital camera at night?- You have to scroll through the menus and select that option- (don't forget to turn it off!) You want to re-connect to a new wi-fi (wireless) network or a secure network, you need to view available networks, choose one or add an encrypted key. Need to watch a video online?- You need to know your connection speed and choose your player.

Note: If these examples are no-brainer tasks for you, then you are probably deep in the forest of configuration and configuration is second nature to you. This article explains why you might not be able to relate to why configuration is such a major usability issue for average users (Average users = people who don't work with computers for a living).  

Symptoms of "Configuration Hell"

1. On the web. A shopping cart is a type of configuration experience. When you remove an item and forget to update the cart, your cart will be inaccurate. Playing with a poor shopping cart is a symptom of configuration hell. Navigation usability issues can be seen as a type of configuration SNAFU in the sense that users are trying to steer a website in a particular direction to serve up the desired pages or functionality.

Changing an interface from current state to desired state is the basic unit of the task of configuration.

2. Updating Your Account. Amazon's lousy Account Management user experience (which never seems to get any better) is another example. Ever notice how hard it has been over the years to get  information on an order at Amazon? So difficult, they put an "animated demo" of the Account section in there to "help" (see this article about how Help, Never Does).

3. Mobile Devices. Tried setting up email on your mobile phone (smartphone or PDA) lately? It can be a total nightmare depending on your phone brand/model.

4. Operating Systems. No finer example. The entire Operating System user experience (Windows, Mac and Linux) is a big configuration love fest. Installation and in particular driver installation are artifacts of the legacy of software configuration (Yes, configuration for end-users is part of the past, and not part of the future, I believe. The big shift in Windows came with auto-detection of Media devices and Wireless networks in Windows XP in 2001). Ever tried going online with a Windows 2000 laptop and your wireless card? It will boil your blood.

Lindows has tried to address the OS software installation experience (an aspect of configuration) with near instant installation of the entire Operating System  ("seven minutes" in a recent Extreme Tech review). Another innovation is the streamlining of software installation for the OS with the Click-N-Run functionality (same review next page):

"Click-N-Run - slick, slick, slick!
One of the most annoying things for newbies about installing software in Linux is that most apps don't even give you an icon to click to start them after installation - and it's hard to find those applications in the first place. Experienced Linux users know where to go, and can easily create their own icons, or use the command prompt to start new applications. But Linux newbies aren't used to that and sometimes can't figure out how to find or easily start the application they just installed.

[FS: It's not just a Linux phenomenon! If you need evidence of this, visit a relative and ask them if they are using their printers/scanners/digital cameras etc. You're sure to find issues with driver installation or configuration literacy.]

Thus Lindows has a Click-N-Run feature that makes it simple to find a new application, then download, install and run that application. It all happens with a simple click of the mouse. We've got to give the Lindows people credit; Click-N-Run is well designed and easy to use. It's pretty much a no-brainer to navigate the Click-N-Run store to choose software. And after installation Click-N-Run gives you the option of starting the software, adding a link to it on your desktop or adding it to Auto-start. While this might seem like an unimportant detail - it's not. In fact it's very important".

The Mac has a similar function with regard to installation where .exe files (or .dmg files as they are called) are sometimes drag-able to the Applications folder causing them to be instantly "installed".

5. Browsers. Managed your cookies or Java settings lately? Okay, how about 5 years ago? Spyware these days has more people clearing cookies and cache files- but remember how your co-workers didn't even know how to do that a few years back?

Configuration usability issues leave a trail behind: see this user's helpful tips. The Firefox browser made some leaps and bounds with "browser switching", a technique borrowed from a new trend in banking- the "we'll help you defect" switch kit...

When installing Firefox, it pulls all your Internet Explorer settings over, including bookmarks and cookies to the browser. It's fairly slick and worth noting. The Firefox folks at Mozilla also seem to be aware (article: Realities of Users) of the truths inherent in this posting you are reading now ;-)

6. Blogging software. (Typepad, Moveable Type). Need to show your bio? Add an XML feed? Change your design template? All configuration tasks. Typepad has won an award for making it easier, but still managing these important configuration settings can be a little confusing.

7. Search Engines. Google eliminated the search configuration paradigm, removing the need for users to pre-select the Boolean filters AND/OR/NOT (drop-down menus and radio buttons). Simplicity of search interface was a raging battle at search engine companies for years until Google cleared the noise. However, many website search interfaces are obssesed with letting user's fail with Boolean filtering. (See this related post on Site Search usability for more detail).

8. The List is Endless: Home Theater Systems, Camcorders, Cameras, Web Analytics software, Content Management Systems, Email Marketing Software, Document Management Systems, Spyware Remover software, Firewall software, Anti-Virus software, Instant Messaging Clients, Telematics (Automotive) systems...the list goes on...

Towards Universal Configuration in Design

Why do we have configuration in the first place? The configuration mentality comes to us by way of legacy computer systems and legacy engineering-centered designs.

Configuration is the design decision that says:

• "We don't know what the perfect default should really be".
• "We want to let our users be the final judge".
• "Users can go into these advanced settings to change things".
• "To begin with or to add additional power to the functionality- configuration must occur".

I believe that user experiences that force configuration will become unpopular over time. Rather than exposing users to DIY interface engineering, we need to give them transparency, seamlessness, elegance. Your users should walk up to it and synch! Your users should open it up and be greeted warmly before being transported to their destination. Your system should auto-detect, auto-configure, auto-respond, auto-heal.

Don't let your users play with your brilliance, just let them experience the value they seek.

Why is universal configuration imperative? It relates to appropriately using the interaction design technique of progressive disclosure and also the importance of selecting defaults carefully (the topic of a future post).

Also there is the reality of user behavior. Here's how non-technical users relate to configuration:

1. "Stop it, I don't want to Configure Anything!"

2. "What is configuration?"

3. "Why do I have to configure it?"

4. "What is the best way to configure it?"

5. "What is the fastest way to configure it?"

6. "I didn't know I had to do that".

7. "Why isn't it already set up for me?"

 Universal Configuration is Coming!

Rather than giving users the bitter taste of choosing options and making choices about display views, system settings and feature access-- many manufacturers and application developers are giving users a plug and play user experience. I recently purchased a Toshiba notebook that boasted hasstle-Free "Config-Free" Connectivity on the outside box.
                                                                 

I need to tell you, my expectations were racing- was I about to be embraced by a flesh and blood example of what I call Universal Configuration (auto-configuration everywhere on every thing)? No! The Toshiba laptop was not config-free. It had more configuration gymnastics associated with it than any other laptop I have set up in the last five years. It's problems started with the never mentioned and unique hard key wireless lock switch (defaulted to "lock" or wireless "off" mode). To simply go online with Windows XP, I had to involve technical support and it took several hours of trouble-shooting!

Bottom line: We need the mentality of Universal Plug and Play and Universal Configuration in design and development, period. You should open a new laptop in the future and have simultaneous config-free access to wireless, ethernet LAN and dial-up connectivity without any need to manually configure. Windows XP wireless network auto-detection and configuration is a great leap forward. However, have you ever tried configuring a dial-up connection from a hotel lately? If you haven't done it in a while, be prepared for a "configuration hell" experience.

Best Wishes,
Frank Spillers, MS